Minnesota Recount May be Unconstitutional

addthis_url=”; addthis_title=”; addthis_pub=’migulski’;

The 2000 Supreme Court decision may have an effect on the 2008 (going into 2009) Minnesota senate race:

By a vote of 7-2, Bush v. Gore (2000) ruled that Florida’s recount violated the principle that all votes must be treated uniformly. Applying precedents dating to the 1960s, the Court found that the Equal Protection Clause meant that ballots must be treated so as to give every vote equal weight. A state may not, by “arbitrary and disparate treatment, value one person’s vote over that of another.” Florida’s lack of standards produced “unequal evaluation of ballots in several respects.” The state’s supreme court “ratified this uneven treatment” and created more of its own, and was unconstitutional.
Wall Street Journal

Leave a Reply